1. Catalogs
  2. CL Medical
  3. MAle stress Urinary Incontinence

MAle stress Urinary Incontinence

MAle stress Urinary Incontinence
1 / 17 PagesView full catalog

MAle stress Urinary Incontinence

Product catalog summary
Introduction
Male stress urinary incontinence, often following prostate surgery, significantly affects quality of life. Despite advancements, incontinence rates vary, and some patients require interventions like artificial urinary sphincters or slings.
Historical Context
Initial surgical attempts to address incontinence involved slings and bone-anchored supports, evolving over time with mixed success and complications.
Mechanism and Effectiveness of Slings
Postoperative incontinence mechanisms are unclear, possibly involving sphincter impairment. Slings aim to restore function by repositioning and supporting the sphincter. MRI studies suggest other factors beyond urethral mobility contribute to incontinence.
Clinical Evaluation
Incontinence severity is assessed with various tools, though definitions vary. Pre-surgical evaluations check for contraindications like strictures or infections. Urodynamic assessments, while not routine, can provide insights into sphincter function.
Types of Slings
Adjustable Slings: Allow postoperative adjustments to improve outcomes, with examples like Argus®, Remeex®, and ATOMS®. Complications include pain, infection, and device removal.
Transobturator Slings: Commonly used, with AdVance® and AdVanceXP® models offering modifications to prevent urinary retention. Success rates vary, with a 67.7% cure rate at 12 months.
Alternative Slings: I Stop TOMS® and Quadratic Virtue® slings offer moderate support, with mixed results.
Complications and Failures
Complications are rare but include sling explantation and infection. Urinary retention is common but often resolves. Sling slippage and inappropriate indications can cause failure.
Indications
Slings are less effective than artificial sphincters but easier to use. Severe incontinence is linked to higher failure rates, while mild to moderate incontinence with good sphincter function is ideal.
Specifications and Indications
Urethral pressure below 57 cm of water increases treatment failure risk. The "repositioning test" during cystoscopy can assess sphincter function.
Patient Expectations and Preoperative Considerations
Patients expect a cure, but success rates vary. Previous radiotherapy increases failure risk, and patients should be informed of potential outcomes.
Retrospective Review and Patient Groups
A review of AdVance® sling placement categorized patients into "ideal" and "non-ideal" groups, with ideal candidates having mild to moderate incontinence and no history of radiation or previous surgeries.
Recommendations and Prognosis
Artificial sphincters are recommended for poor prognosis patients to avoid multiple surgeries. Slings can be considered for motivated patients who refuse hydraulic devices, with informed risk awareness.
Conclusion
Patient selection is crucial for successful outcomes in male incontinence surgery. Understanding incontinence causes remains challenging, and reliable clinical tests are lacking. Slings are a viable option when used judiciously.
See more

Catalog excerpts

MAle stress Urinary Incontinence-1

Urodynamics, Neurourology and Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions Donatella Pistoles! Male Stress

 Open the catalog to page 1
MAle stress Urinary Incontinence-2

Functional Devices Jérôme Grall According to the World Health Organisation definition, incontinence is a nonintentional and bothersome loss of urine from the urethral meatus. As a mostly iatrogenic situation (post-radical prostatectomy in a majority of cases), male incontinence has a significant impact on quality of life [1]. Surgical prostate removal, dealing with very close links between prostate, urinary sphincter and neurovascular bundles, always bears high risks on continence. Disappointingly, open and laparoscopic procedures (including robot assisted), do not make any difference on continence,...

 Open the catalog to page 2
MAle stress Urinary Incontinence-3

and permanent efficacy, no moving parts, no significant voiding obstruction, low cost and minimal morbidity [4]. Research is under way. But so far overall sling results are not as good as expected; the way slings work and the explanations for failures are not always understood and there is still a need for a better patient selection. The huge differences in sling results, when comparing incontinence and cure rates, show how difficult it is to have reliable data based on common definitions and how risky it is to compare study results. As a consequence, the reader must be aware of occasional biases...

 Open the catalog to page 3
MAle stress Urinary Incontinence-4

As shown by an MRI study of 12 patients before and after sling placement (AdVance®), urethral mobility is not observed in all cases. On cough test, maximum bladder neck movement along the pubococcygeal line ranges from 3 to 7 mm. None of the patients have postoperative urethral mobility, but the lack of preoperative mobility does not appear to be a negative prognostic factor [8]. As a result, urethral and sphincter mobility is not the only incontinence mechanism and therefore urethral repositioning is not the only way slings might act. This study provided interesting images of bulbar support...

 Open the catalog to page 4
MAle stress Urinary Incontinence-5

incontinence severity on functional result is thus an indication that residual sphincter function (retrograde leak point pressure RLPP or pressure profile) might not be the only explanation for incontinence severity. Data from pre- and postoperative urodynamics [11] indicate modifications in mean urethral closure pressure and functional length, without reaching statistical significance due to the reduced number of patients. Another way to assess sphincter function relies on visible sphincter activity on cystoscopy [2]. Whereas it is a common advice to prefer a good sphincter residual function before...

 Open the catalog to page 5
MAle stress Urinary Incontinence-6

9.5.1.1 Argus® (Promedón, Córdoba, Argentina) Argus® device features a silicone cushion placed underneath the bulbar urethra (Fig. 9.1), two retropubic silicone columns with multiple cone structure and two silicone rings/washers running on the columns and resting on the rectus fascia for tension adjustment [1]. Surgical procedure: In lithotomy position, a perineal incision exposes bulbar urethra. A transverse suprapubic incision exposes enough rectus fascia bilaterally to accommodate silicone rings. A 90° crochet needle is inserted through perineal membrane between bulbar urethra and ischiopubic...

 Open the catalog to page 6
MAle stress Urinary Incontinence-7

external radiation for prostate cancer with a poor 15 % success rate [1]. Urethral stricture and bladder neck surgery are also associated with poor prognosis [7]. Complications following Argus placement are as frequent as 55 %, particularly in cases of severe incontinence. They range from urinary retention (16 %), infection, bladder or urethral erosion, to sling rupture, urethral stricture and perineal hypersensitivity and pain, leading to 11 % sling removal. Argus® experiences are not homogeneous. If some data suggest roughly similar cure rates up to 79 % with 38.6 % readjustment (but 15 % perineal...

 Open the catalog to page 7
MAle stress Urinary Incontinence-8

transverse incision. The same is done on the other side. Cystoscopy checks for bladder integrity. The threads are then pulled upward to be secured into the Varitensor. The external manipulator is left connected to the Varitensor via the uncoupler through suprapubic incision. The morning after tension adjustment is done on the standing patient while performing Valsalva manoeuvre by rotating external manipulator clockwise or counterclockwise. A second adjustment could be done later under local anaesthesia and minimal skin incision [14]. Introduced in the early 2000s, Remeex® provided rather good...

 Open the catalog to page 8
MAle stress Urinary Incontinence-9

mechanism is certainly different (sphincter deficiency is a very poor prognostic factor for TOT). In a 20-patient clinical study, it appeared for the first time that supporting the urethra could lead to an increase in urethral closure pressure from 13 to 86 cm of water, and in urethral length from 3 to 17 mm. Despite much less convincing results were to come, sling design was aimed since the very beginning to supporting urethra and sphincter in order to lengthen and strengthen the functional area [16]. 9.5.2.1 Advance and Advance XP (American Medical Systems: Minnetonka, Minnesota, USA) AdVance®...

 Open the catalog to page 9
MAle stress Urinary Incontinence-10

show no difference following sling placement neither in urethral pressure nor in uroflow. Advance® evolved into Advance XP® in late 2010 [19]. Overtensioning of the sling, when removing the Tyvek liners, had been responsible for urinary retention. Modifications were thus designed to secure sling release and anchor it in obturator membrane. The results of a multicentre prospective study at 12 months follow-up show a 67.7 % cure rate and an increase in quality of life. It is a good result, as a matter of fact, but it must be observed that cure rate includes residual urine loss up to 5 g per day,...

 Open the catalog to page 10
MAle stress Urinary Incontinence-11

Cause of Failure: Slippage The explanation for delayed failures after an initial dry period might be related to sling slippage as they could occur immediately after an increase of physical activity within a month of sling placement. Among the reasons for sling failure are most probably inappropriate indication, misplacement or sling “slippage” [28]. MRI, which has been tested as a tool for assessing sling placement, can help to understand the way sling works in restoring continence. T2-weighted sequence with a 3 T MRI is able to differentiate the sling from the hyper-intense urethral bulb. AdVance®...

 Open the catalog to page 11
*Prices are pre-tax. They exclude delivery charges and customs duties and do not include additional charges for installation or activation options. Prices are indicative only and may vary by country, with changes to the cost of raw materials and exchange rates.