Design for Manufacturability: From Concept to Reality By Georges Assimilalo, COO and Vice President of Engineering Laura Goodfellow, Associate Director, Quality Systems Precipart (Farmingdale, NY) Design for Manufacturability (DFM) is a well-established practice, essential in realizing the transformation of new product concepts into mass-produced medical devices. And yet, all too often, issues that could have been avoided are identified very late in the process, impacting production costs and schedules. This suggests that key DFM principles are often underutilized in practice and not applied consistently, or to the degree necessary, to avoid these negative implications. In this white paper, we will discuss three DFM-based best practices that will help create the conditions for success as manufacturing partners work with device designers towards a common goal. Engaging key stakeholders in an organized team from the inception of a project, conducting a thorough feasibility study, and implementing the proper quality tools will ensure that a device design is reliable, manufacturable, and acceptable to the physician or end user. Integrated Product Development: One team, Multiple Disciplines The first and most important element of DFM is a truly integrated multi-disciplinary product and design development team. Effective collaboration can help ensure that elegant engineering solutions are practical to manufacture from a cost or materials standpoint, and suit the end user. An integrated team also helps reduce the risk of a “silo” approach and an overemphasis of any one element, and design considerations being overlooked. A senior staff engineer from one device manufacturer said the level and degree of the DFM teams vary, but may involve representatives from product management, quality and design engineering, regulatory, packaging, purchasing, calibration, prototyping, post-market, and others, as required. All critical customer requirements must be clearly established during initial team meetings, as total project lifecycle costs and speed to market are often dictated early on in the process. A solid interdisciplinary team considers important details such as performance characteristics, cost, timeline, clinical needs, and regulatory requirements. Consulting with key suppliers early can avoid costly rework later down the line
Open the catalog to page 1The Feasibility Study: Charting the Course for Success A comprehensive feasibility study examines the key specifications throughout the life of a project and requires the team to thoroughly review and consider all potential design issues from the project’s beginning. This type of study will provide information on a number of aspects that are crucial to the success of a product. Some aspects to consider include: • Materials Selection. This step is critical because biocompatibility issues often combine with metallurgical and process challenges to impact manufacturing techniques downstream. The...
Open the catalog to page 2frequent cause of rejection and production delays. Some clinicians demand a pristine-looking reflective mirror finish, which may require specialized metals, surface treatments, polishing or blasting. Other instruments need duller finishes to reduce glare during surgical procedures. The need for easy sterilization is another design factor that often guides DFM teams in selecting materials and processes. Where instrument life and durability is an issue, the team may recommend electropolishing or the use of anodized metal. The look and feel of a device or instrument may make the difference in acceptance...
Open the catalog to page 3the team in troubleshooting and in working their way through worst-case scenario factors during the design process. When possible, device designers should provide their suppliers and partners with an overall system FMEA, in order to identify the most important product features and design tolerances, to determine how to control them and document the process including all changes. This system FMEA provides the direct inputs for the supplier’s design failure mode and effect analysis (DFMEA). The DFMEA will provide the basis for critical decisions from the end-user’s perspective. For example, if...
Open the catalog to page 4A sound DFM plan recognizes that successfully and efficiently manufacturing a product depends on more than features, marketing appeal or even ergonomics. Ultimately, the best-designed product in the world will only be successful if it can be produced within the given parameters. Consistently applying DFM principles and best practices will allow for a successful product that may be mass-produced cost-effectively and brought to market with minimal delays. Georges Assimilalo is Chief Operating Officer and Vice President of Engineering at Precipart, where he has worked for 23 years managing the engineering...
Open the catalog to page 51 Page
2 Pages
2 Pages