1. Catalogs
  2. Single Use Surgical
  3. DIRTY SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS PUTTING PATIENTS AT RISK

DIRTY SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS PUTTING PATIENTS AT RISK

DIRTY SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS PUTTING PATIENTS AT RISK

DIRTY SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS PUTTING PATIENTS AT RISK

Product catalog summary

Introduction

The press release from Single Use Surgical highlights the risks associated with using improperly cleaned surgical instruments, which can lead to severe patient infections. The document emphasizes the benefits of switching to single-use instruments to mitigate these risks.

Case Study: John Harrison

John Harrison, a patient from Texas, suffered severe complications due to an infection from improperly cleaned surgical instruments. This incident was part of a larger outbreak at The Methodist Hospital in Houston, prompting an investigation by the hospital and the CDC.

Investigation Findings

The investigation revealed that instruments like arthroscopic shavers and cannulae were not adequately cleaned, leading to contamination. Internal inspections showed residual human tissue and bone, despite appearing clean externally.

Wider Implications

Reports by CPI and NBC News indicate that the issue of dirty surgical instruments is widespread in the US. Investigations have found numerous cases of infections linked to improperly cleaned instruments, including a significant incident involving US veterans.

Challenges in Instrument Cleaning

Experts highlight the difficulty in cleaning intricate instruments with narrow channels, which often retain blood and tissue. Time constraints and improper cleaning methods exacerbate the problem, leading to potential cross-contamination risks.

UK's Response

In the UK, hospitals have addressed these concerns by adopting single-use instruments, particularly for those with narrow channels. The Royal Hallamshire Hospital was among the first to make this switch, significantly reducing infection risks.

Single Use Surgical's Initiative

Single Use Surgical advocates for the adoption of single-use instruments in the US, aiming to educate hospitals on the benefits of reducing infection risks and alleviating sterilization burdens.

Conclusion

The press release underscores the importance of transitioning to single-use surgical instruments to enhance patient safety and reduce hospital-acquired infections.

See more

Catalog excerpts

DIRTY SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS PUTTING PATIENTS AT RISK-1

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: March 12, 2012 Email [email protected] Website www.susl.co.uk Contact: Alycia Burton Tel: +44 1226 732 333 Email: [email protected] DIRTY SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS PUTTING PATIENTS AT RISK Reports by The Center for Public Integrity (CPI) and NBC News suggest surgeons are using medical instruments contaminated with hidden tissue, blood and debris. Single Use Surgical recommends replacing difficult-to-clean devices with single-use to protect patients from hospital acquired infection It started with the case of John Harrison, a 63 year-old from Texas, who experienced severe complications two weeks after what should have been a routine operation on his shoulder. During emergency surgery doctors discovered that Harrison had been infected with P.aeruginosa, a potentially lethal bacterium that had eaten away part of the bone in his shoulder and rotator cuff. And this was not an isolated incident; Harrison was one of seven joint surgery patients who had also contracted infections during a two week period at The Methodist Hospital in Houston. This outbreak stimulated the hospital and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to launch an inquiry into how the bacteria had survived the cleaning and sterilisation process. The results revealed that there were two likely sources of the infection: from an arthroscopic shaver, a power tool used to shave away bone; and the inside of a long narrow cannula used for irrigation and suction of the surgical site. As part of the investigation, they also inspected areas of these surgical instruments that are invisible to the naked eye using a small camera. The findings showed that although the tools appeared clean on the outside, the internal picture was much different, with human tissue and bone found in the devices. Additionally sterilisation staff had not been cleaning cannulae using brushes but simply by running tap water through the instruments. The Tip of the Iceberg Some may argue that the Methodist case was a one off. However when Joe Eaton, an investigative reporter at CPI, chose to explore the wider picture in the US, the results were shocking. Eaton found that the Methodist incident is one of many where the use of improperly cleaned instruments has led to patient infection. One such case was brought to light in 2009 when the Department of Veterans Affairs issued a statement that 10,737 US veterans may have been infected by dirty endoscopes. A number of those patients have since tested positive for HIV, hepatitis B and hepatitis C. Furthermore Eaton brought to light the findings of Jahan Azizi, a Risk Management Clinical Engineer at the University of Michigan Health System. Azizi inspected the inside of 350 suction tips after cleaning and sterilization and found that all of the suction tubes contained blood, bone, tissue and even rust. It could be said that the instruments had not been cleaned properly. However Azizi tested this theory by then cleaning all the instruments following manufacturer’s instructions and inspecting them again. Reexamination showed only 7 of the 350 suctions were free from debris. Azizi chose to investigate suction tubes as they are used in almost every surgical procedure. Following his research he said “I don’t know who approved this [suction tubes] or who made this a reusable item, but this is not a reusable or cleanable item…there are a lot of them that are difficult or impossible to clean.” The CPI report added to this, commenting on how surgical advancement has led to the demand for more intricate instruments with narrow channels amongst the features; “those tiny channels become clogged with unseen blood and tissue” Eaton said. SUS AEB

 Open the catalog to page 1
DIRTY SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS PUTTING PATIENTS AT RISK-2

Email [email protected] Website www.susl.co.uk Eaton also spoke to Charles Hancock, an independent medical device sterilization consultant who commented on how the time constraints put on sterilization staff could also be contributing to improperly cleaned devices. Instruments are often cleaned too rapidly but Hancock also said that they can often sit around for hours, even days, before cleaning which allows blood and debris to dry. If an instrument is then improperly cleaned, heat from sterilization can “bake” the debris onto surgical tools; creating hardened deposits that are very difficult to...

 Open the catalog to page 2
DIRTY SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS PUTTING PATIENTS AT RISK-3

Email [email protected] Website www.susl.co.uk About Single Use Surgical, Inc. Single Use Surgical provides an alternative to reprocessing instruments with narrow channels. It offers a wide range of disposable suction tube instruments for use in surgical procedures across several specialties. The company’s focus on high quality, ergonomic design and customer support provides hospitals with a cost-effective alternative to reprocessing difficult-to-clean instruments. Switching to single-use also reduces the volume of complex devices that pass through Central Sterile, helping to alleviate time constraints...

 Open the catalog to page 3

All Single Use Surgical catalogs and technical brochures

*Prices are pre-tax. They exclude delivery charges and customs duties and do not include additional charges for installation or activation options. Prices are indicative only and may vary by country, with changes to the cost of raw materials and exchange rates.